SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:38:28 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
About a month ago, I said:

> Our local vendor built us a Supermicro/Adaptec
> system with 16x1TB SATA drives.  We have a 12TB
> partition that they built as EXT2.  When I tried
> to add journaling, it took forever, and then the
> system locked up.  On reboot, the FS was still
> EXT2, and takes hours (even empty) to fsck.  Based
> on the messages flying by I am also not confident
> fsck rally understands a filesystem this large.
> 
> Is the XFS module stable on 5.1 and 5.2?  (The
> vendor installed 5.1 because that's what they
> have, but I ran "yum update"), so it's effectively
> 5.2.

I rebuilt 12TB partition as XFS.  But after about 11GB
of data moved, the system locked up with "bus error".
After reboot, the system looks fine.  The vendor always
runs diags and burns the systems in, though it could
still be hardware or driver issue.

Is it likely to be the OS/XFS with the large partition,
or would you just send it back for diagnostics again?
Supermicros have been very reliable for us, but between
the Adaptec and 1TB SATAs, and the large partition, I'm
not sure how reliable the current drivers are.

I'd hoped to just have one mount point, but could make
2-3 smaller partitions if that seems to be the likely
issue.

Thanks,
Miles

ATOM RSS1 RSS2