Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:52:15 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jon Peatfield wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>> Hi Jon,
>> Yes, that makes sense, and actually sounds like a good idea.
>> I personally think renaming it to "xfs-filesystem" makes the most sense.
>> Because if it was xfs-meta, people still might think it is dealing with the
>> fonts.
>> Does anyone else have any ideas or thoughts?
>> I'll see if I can get this into the testing area tomorrow if others think
>> this is a good idea.
>
> I'd certainly be happy to test how it behaves for me though I'm not (yet)
> using xfs except for testing a few things.
>
> Of course this change shouldn't affect the kernel modules at all so
> *ought* to just change the issues with dependencies etc.
>
> -- Jon
It's up in testing for SL 5.
Had a naming problem with SL 4, but it should be up there soon, and I'll get
the email sent.
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|