SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Summerfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Summerfield <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:49:38 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Miles O'Neal wrote:
> Salvador Aguinaga said...
> 
> |I've wondered if any of you have used scientific linux on a x86 hardware to
> |run a single application ( like an embedded OS ) and disable updates and
> |remove unneeded packages?
> 
> Sure, at least a dozen times.
> 
> |Or if you there is a better alternative to accomplish the same thing.
> 
> That depends on what you are trying to do with it.
> For instance when I needed a bridging firewall a
> few years back, there was no east way to do that
> with SL (I tried for 2 day), so I gave up and used
> freesco.
> 
> But, just for example, we've done this with DMZ
> systems, fileservers, and a handful of others.  
> Very straightforward; just install what you need,
> remove the extras it installed anyway, and only
> turn on the minimum services necessary.
> 
> Update manually as needed.
> 
> Works fine.
> 
If SL does what you want, that's fine. For a smaller image, rpm supports 
omitting documentation, though I haven't seen a way of doing that via 
yum. It's something you might wish to explore.

Debian has an rpmstrap script that's part of something else that can be 
used to create a (CentOS and so probably SL) image. That could be 
brutalised to do what you want.




-- 

Cheers
John

-- spambait
[log in to unmask]  [log in to unmask]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

You cannot reply off-list:-)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2