SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rachid Ayad <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rachid Ayad <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:55:47 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
  If IDE so it should be hda.

  Rachid.

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Ken Teh wrote:

> I'm getting confused with the sda/hda naming conventions.  I thought all
> SATA disks were sd devices.  They were a while back but apparently, not
> anymore.  And, I can't seem to make any sense of when an sda is an hda.
> I'm currently installing a system with a SATA system disk that has a IDE
> CDROM.  A systemrescuecd (Gentoo based kernel) identifies the disk as an
> sda.  But the 5.2 installer says it's an hda.  There's a single IDE
> connector on the MB on which hangs a CDROM drive.  Apparently, it's not an
> hda.  What is it?  An sda?
>
> What gives?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2