SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jean-Paul Chaput <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jean-Paul Chaput <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Sep 2008 20:40:37 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (73 lines)
Hello John,


What you have seen are kernels of differents versions.

  kernel-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.x86_64       : up to date.
  kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.JSP1.x86_64  : obsolete.
  kernel-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.JSP1.x86_64  : obsolete.

I could have built a newer one with a version incremenent
that would have been greater than the latest (NFS lockd) released,
but this would mix up with the SL/TUV kernel versioning.
That is, my "newer" kernel could get in the way and block
updates from the distrib.

So I made a "variant", that is another kernel but with the
same version, so it do get in the way of the updates.
Besides, it allows to revert to the up-to-date stock kernel
in case of unexpected problem.

Unfortunately, we uses our NFS shares with the "nolock" option
(my fellow sysadmin managing the servers under BSD, tells me 
 that the lockd algorithm is intrinsistically flawed and do
 not want to uses it). So I haven't tested it yet.

I've made this kernel avalaible because I took me little time
(automated procedure...) and some people seemed to be stuck
by this bug.


Best Regard,


On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 05:50:33PM +0100, Jon Peatfield wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Jean-Paul Chaput wrote:
> 
> >Hi List,
> >
> >I'v rebuild the latest kernel (2.6.18-92.1.10.el5) with patch BZ#453094 
> >included.
> >That new kernel is build as a kernel variant named "SoC" (like "xen" or 
> >"PAE")
> >so it can be installed whithout replacing any stock kernel.
> 
> Multiple kernels can be installed at the same time anyway, so you don't 
> need to add a special 'varient' or anything to get that, e.g. on one box 
> here I see:
> 
> $ rpm -q kernel
> kernel-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.JSP1.x86_64
> kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.JSP1.x86_64
> kernel-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.x86_64
> 
> BTW does the patch actually seem to fix the problem?  Currently most of my 
> important NFS file servers are still running sl4 so I've not had much 
> incentive to investigate just yet.
> 
>  -- Jon

-- 

      .-.           J e a n - P a u l   C h a p u t
      /v\     A d m i n i s t r a t e u r   S y s t e m e
    /(___)\                       |
     ^^ ^^                        |-- e-mail : [log in to unmask]
                                  `-- Tel    : (33) 01.44.27.53.99 [prof.]
                                                    06.66.25.35.55 [port.]
                                                    01.47.46.01.31 [pers.]

    U P M C   Universite Pierre & Marie Curie
    L I P 6   Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris VI
    A S I M   Architecture des Systemes Integres et Micro-electronique

ATOM RSS1 RSS2