SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:45:59 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Stephen Isard <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Can anyone explain why the fvwm window manager has been dropped in SL5?
> I've searched and found no discussion apart from a remark at
> http://www-zeuthen.desy.de/technisches_seminar/texte/sl3z.pdf that "we
> probably can't fight UTF-8 any longer".  However, fvwm 2.5 claims "full
> internationalization" and the man page makes a number of references to
> utf-8, so that doesn't appear to be a complete explanation.
>
> The tar file from the fvwm site compiles with no problems and runs as it
> always has, as far as I can see.
>

fvwm was dropped from RHEL most likely due to the usual: number of
users versus complexity of support. The numbers of using fvwm is much
smaller than their core market and so dealing with support issues with
it has a higher cost. The fact that the SL people are a smaller group
means that the packages that they chose to add beyond the core need to
fit their 'mission'.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2