SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Burch <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:13:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Dear All,

Are the md5sum's for SL 5.2 x86_64 iso's OK?

I pulled down SL 52 x86_64 iso's (Tue Jun 24 13:02:36 CDT 2008) from: 
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/52/iso/x86_64/
Ran my md5sum against them, but they did not match.

[me@xxxxx]$ md5sum SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
937abd48c9a56fb41339a9ab50f53ab6  SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso

[me@xxxxx]$ cat SL.52.061808.x86_64.SHA1SUM
079dd3540db6f9b9b21f06883a8ad89e20231680  SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
...

Or am I confused?

Thanks,

Robert Burch Jr
Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University

PS Great job on SL and this list!!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2