Troy - some of our machines are configured with the EPEL repository
and we have observed conflicts between SL and EPEL graphviz
packages. With graphviz available from EPEL, is it important
to have it as part of SL5? Which version is better maintained?

K.O.


On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:44:03AM -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to update the version of graphviz that will be in SL 5.2. 
> There is a minor bug in the current one, and I figured we'd just update 
> to the latest.
> Well, as some have noticed, we got some new modules, and some of the old 
> modules didn't build.  I think I can fix up everything except for
> graphviz-lua and graphviz-ocaml
> 
> Now, here's the odd part.
> Our past rpm didn't have these rpm's requiring lua and ocaml 
> respectavely.  And the bigger problem is that lua and ocaml aren't even 
> in Scientific Linux, they are in Dag's repository.
> 
> So, the question is this.
> Did anyone use these particular packages?
> And if you did, did they work without adding packages from Dag?
> 
> I would like to just take them out, since it looks like it's a mistake 
> that we have them in.
> 
> Any objections?  Problems?
> 
> Troy
> -- 
> __________________________________________________
> Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
> Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
> __________________________________________________

-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada