SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:29:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I've used mount's in the kickstart %post section like forever and I never 
needed 'nolock' until 5.x.  All I did was 'mount -rvt nfs server:/remote 
/local'.  I also did not start the nfslock service.



Jon Peatfield wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Steve Traylen wrote:
> <snip>
>>
>> It has been ages since I 've done this but certainly in the past the
>> mount needed both
>> a nolock and nfsvers=2
>>
>> mount -o nolock,nfsvers=2
> 
> I'm pretty sure that we don't need to add nfsvers any more - I know we 
> don't use it.  I'm not sure if the nolock is really needed any more but 
> we still do that - though we also start up the nfslock stuff too as well 
> :-)
> 
> We now do nfs mounts in %pre as well since we found that nfs access to 
> our extra local repos (via file:// locations) is faster (and uses less 
> memory) than either ftp: or http: forms of access from anaconda.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2