Robert E. Blair wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I have a x86_64 install of 5.1 and on it I have installed a version of
> openoffice from openoffice.org and don't have any pieces of openoffice
> from the 5.1 distribution.  This morning it wanted to "update" my
> openoffice 2.4.1 with the distribution 2.3 version.  I put an exclude in
> sl-security.repo and sl.repo to tell it not to, but does anyone know why
> it would want to do this?  The standard openoffice.org release is rpm
> based so it should know better.
> - --
> Robert E. Blair, Room E277, Building 362

The openoffice in Scientific Linux has an epoch of 1, which that from 
openoffice.org has an epoch of 0.

   yum list openoffice\*

That 1: at the beginning of our openoffice version is the epoch number.

I don't know why redhat put a 1 on it, but they did.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________