Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:59:47 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We get all our updates from:
rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/50/x86_64/updates/security
Viz:
fgibbins@geosl548 home $ rsync
rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/50/x86_64/updates/security/
| grep openssl
-rw-r--r-- 1462393 2007/10/18 22:41:53 openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.i686.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1477608 2007/10/22 21:18:52
openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1932138 2007/10/18 22:41:53
openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.i386.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1946437 2007/10/22 21:18:52
openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 32527 2007/10/22 21:18:52
openssl-perl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm
fgibbins@geosl548 home $
Yours
Faye
Troy Dawson wrote:
> Faye Gibbins wrote:
>> More repo problems on x86_64
>>
>> when trying to install openssl-devel our SL5.0 boxes insists on asking
>> for an install of 'openssl = 0.9.8b-8.3.2' despite openssl release
>> 8.3.el5.2 being installed.
>>
>>
>> Should the openssl rpm have a release number "8.3.2" rather than
>> "8.3.el5.2"?
>>
>> Yours
>> Faye
>>
>
> Hi Faye,
> By definition (not by reality) openssl 8.3.2 is *newer* than 8.3.el5.2.
> It was a compile time mistake we made by not having %dist set. (Long
> story)
>
> But I could have sworn that I removed all the 8.3.2 rpm's.
> Where is it trying to get it from? I need to clean it up.
>
> Thanks
> Troy
--
---------------------------------------------------------
Faye Gibbins, Computing Officer (Infrastructure Services)
GeoS KB; Linux, Unix, Security and Networks.
Beekeeper - The Apiary Project, KB - www.bees.ed.ac.uk
---------------------------------------------------------
I grabbed at spannungsbogen before I knew I wanted it.
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body,
registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
|
|
|