SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 May 2008 09:56:40 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually after I sent that and tried to look ... I cannot find any of
>>> their
>>> packages from yesterday.  Which is odd.  They usually beat us on pushing
>>> stuff out.
>>> Troy
>>
>> Because of 5.2?  Updates/fixes for 5.2 might not be released until
>> CentOS 5.2 is out?
>>
>> Akemi
>
> I did not think these were updates specifically for Update 2.  Yes, they are
> both security fixes and bug fixes, (which is irritating), but as far as I
> can see, the security fixes apply to all RHEL 5 releases, not just Update 2.
> Or have I missed something.
> Troy

I guess only CentOS devs can answer why those packages are being
held... But if those dated May 21 are regarded as "zero-day" updates,
then they may be released at the time of the CentOS 5.2 release.

Akemi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2