Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:56:36 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
hi Fernando,
SMP or not is a kernel compile-time choice, as you are likely aware.
I have never seen it as an installation option.
Maybe the SL keepers have such a kernel ready to go, I don't know.
Regardless, the kernel headers would have to be installed to compile things
against your installed kernel. This is something you can select during
installation,
or afterwards (such as with add/remove software or yum).
It sounds like maybe you have already done this.
If you want, you can post your compile errors here.
I have never seen a situation where smp support caused a compile failure.
Its very interesting, thanks
-mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fernando Rannou" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 9:31 AM
Subject: SL 5.1 non-smp versus smp
Hello
I have noticed that there is no SMP kernel in the
repositories. Is this right?
How can I choose between SMP and no SMP kernel during the
installation?
It seems that the installation picked the SMP version
automatically, but I do not want it because I have some
modules that do not compile with it (Cisco VPN)
Thanks for your help
Fernando
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que está limpio.
MailScanner agradece a transtec Computers por su apoyo.
|
|
|