SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Summerfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Summerfield <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:17:31 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (58 lines)
Mikhail Kompaniets wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As I know Cell/B.E. is based on IBM's Power architecture.
> 
> SL5x is now available only for Intel x86 and x86_64 architectures.
> 
> So there is no ready-to-use solution for you here.
> 
There might be. Check CentOS, another (more popular) RHEL clone.

> Mikhail
> 
> 
> 
> Salamanka A. Serge пишет:
>> Dear SL users and developers,
>>
>> Could you please tell whether SL 5.1 distribution supports the 
>> multi-core Cell Broadband Engine processor.
>>
>> There is a need to choose and install OS for IBM BladeCenter QS21 
>> which is based on Cell/B.E. processor. On the IBM web-site ( 
>> http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/cell  ,tab downloads) it 
>> is said that IBM BladeCenter QS21 is the only RHEL5.1-supported 
>> execution platform and a modified version of the Fedora 7 Linux kernel 
>> is provided for Cell/B.E. hardware.
>>
>> I suppose that SL5.1 is RHEL5.1, that is why it is safe install SL5.1 
>> on this machine.
>> Could you please verify.
>> I will appreciate if anyone tells how to determine whether SL5.1 
>> supports Cell/B.E. processor.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Please reply in a shortest time possible.
>>
>> Serge
>> UIIP
>> Minsk
> 


-- 

Cheers
John

-- spambait
[log in to unmask]  [log in to unmask]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

You cannot reply off-list:-)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2