On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Jon Peatfield wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Connie Sieh wrote:
>
>> ftp.scientificlinux.org is now up.
>> 
>> The new test NFS kernel died when there was a "NFS server" problem.
>> We have gone back to the prior kernel.
>> 
>> -Connie Sieh
>
> Sorry to be a pain, but which 'test' kernel was that?  I should probably be 
> able to tell but is this an sl4 or sl5 server?

It was the one that Troy mentioned on Friday to fix NFS issues for SL5.

-Connie Sieh

>
> I'm currently trying to decide whether to stop waiting for TUV to get their 
> act together and just roll my own version of kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6 without the 
> 4 patches which reduce nfs-client performance and adding in the nfs-server 
> ACL patch (nfsd has had acl support broken since -53 as far as I can tell).
>
> If you mean -78 or -79 then those havn't been through much QA yet wich is why 
> I'm not happy to put them in production yet.
>
> Most of my 'important' servers are *still* running sl4 and I'm still trying 
> to decide if I trust them not to have slipped something into 2.6.9-67.0.4 
> which breaks nfs there as well so those are still using 2.6.9-67.0.1 at the 
> moment...
>
> -- Jon
>