SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

February 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:22:29 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 12:19 PM, Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On Jan 31, 2008 12:13 PM, Glenn Morris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just want to confirm one more thing. This issue is related to the
>>>> client kernel but not the server's. Is this correct?
>>> A .6 client with a .4 server (both x86_64) is noticeably slow, yes.
>>>
>>> It's a production server, so I can't as easily test a .4 client with a
>>> .6 server at the moment.
>> My test was with a 53.1.6 server (x86_64).  So, it looks almost
>> certain that the server kernel does not matter.
>>
>> Johnny Hughes of CentOS filed a bug with the upstream bugzilla:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431092
> 
> Posting a message I sent to the CentOS mailing list.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> A test kernel with a patch that seemingly fixes the issue (at least in
> my test run) has been made available.  The details are in the upstream
> bugzilla filed by Johnny above (Comment #30).
> 
> It would be great if other people give it a try and report the result
> to that bugzilla.
> 
> Akemi

I'm going to give it a try.  Although it usually takes a few days before my 
errors start appearing.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2