Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:01:30 +0000 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Jean-Paul Chaput wrote:
> Hi Scientific Linux,
>
> I've a problem with the latest update of yum-utils (1.0.4-3.el5) from
> the 5x flavor. This package requires yum 3.1.0-0, which seems to be
> non-existent.
Are you sure? I see the following:
$ rpm -qp --requires /opt/instsl/upstream/5x/i386/SL/yum-utils-1.0.4-3.el5.noarch.rpm
/usr/bin/python
python >= 2.4
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
yum >= 3.0.1-5
yum < 3.1.0-0
so it wants a yum version of at least 3.0.1-5 and less than 3.1.0-0.
> I tried to download the source package of yum-utils
> to find out whether it was a typo but can't find a matching source
> (can only get yum-utils-1.0.4-1.sl5.src.rpm).
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
Well yum-utils-1.0.4-2.sl5.src.rpm also exists in the 5rolling/SRPMS/SL/
tree, but I'd guess (since all the changelog entries for
yum-utils-1.0.4-3.el5.noarch.rpm are from TUV) that the srpm just got
missed being copied into the tree...
rpm -qp 5rolling/i386/SL/yum-utils-1.0.4-3.el5.noarch.rpm --changelog
shows no SL changes.
Possibly more confusingly the yum-installonlyn package shows that it was
built from yum-utils-1.0.4-2.sl5.src.rpm
$ rpm -qi yum-installonlyn
Name : yum-installonlyn Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 1.0.4 Vendor: Scientific Linux
Release : 2.sl5 Build Date: Wed Jan 2 19:24:14 2008
Install Date: Wed Jan 16 17:28:49 2008 Build Host: norob.fnal.gov
Group : System Environment/Base Source RPM: yum-utils-1.0.4-2.sl5.src.rpm
Size : 7591 License: GPL
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Wed Jan 2 19:25:04 2008, Key ID da6ad00882fd17b2
URL : http://linux.duke.edu/yum/download/yum-utils/
Summary : plugin which only leaves n 'kernel' packages installed
Description :
A plugin for yum which only leaves n 'kernel' packages installed instead
of infinitely doing installonly
But that src.rpm *wasn't* used to make the yum-utils package since TUV's
yum-utils src.rpm was used instead. I'm now more confused than before I
started looking.
Of course my trees arn't currently in synch 'cos I managed to break
something here while attempting to add 51 to the set of trees we rsync.
> Thanks Troy & Connie for this great (and hard) work.
Indeed we owe them a great deal!
--
Jon Peatfield, Computer Officer, DAMTP, University of Cambridge
Mail: [log in to unmask] Web: http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/
|
|
|