SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:01:09 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Jan Iven wrote:
> On 31/01/08 03:25, Michael Mansour wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:57:35AM +1000, Michael Mansour wrote:
>>>> Is the cern key a valid key?
>>>> # rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-cern
>>>> error: /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-cern: import read failed(0).
>>> It has been like this "for years".
>> Hmm.. why not just remove it or get cern to fix their key?
>>
>> Is this an issue for TUV or SL?
> 
> Neither, this is between CERN and SL.. the key used to work in SL3, but
> newer "rpm" versions insist on a newer GPG key version. The problem
> really just comes from the header lines in the GPG key file, replacing
> 1.2.1 with 1.2.6 works for me (which we (obviously) do for our own
> "site" release, SLC4).
> 
> Correct key is available from
> http://linuxsoft.cern.ch/cern/slc46/x86_64/docs/RPM-GPG-KEY-cern
> (untrusted source etc, but the encoded key blob is actually unchanged).
> 
> Connie/Troy, could you perhaps add this to the next SL releases
> (4.6/5.2)? I don't think this is worth modifying the current images for.
> 
> Sorry
> Jan

Will do,
Thanks Jan

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2