SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

January 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:22:24 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
[log in to unmask] wrote:
> Hi Troy, All,
> 
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Troy Dawson wrote:
> 
>> Send comments/issues/test reports to [log in to unmask]
> 
> The day before this announcement, OpenAFS 1.4.6. was released. It's a bug
> fix only release, addressing issues present in 1.4.5 and earlier releases.
> 
> Except for one patch relevant for Solaris only, all changes address bugs
> in callback handling in the fileserver. That's the issue Thomas reported,
> and they deemed it serious enough to issue a security advisory
> 
>     http://www.openafs.org/security/OPENAFS-SA-2007-003.txt
> 
> and push out 1.4.6. It's a DOS issue only, but crashing a fileserver
> can of course cause data loss as well. In addition, some sites have
> experienced fileserver crashes simply due to using certain versions of the
> windows client under special circumstances.
> 
> I wonder whether we could still get 1.4.6 into 5.1? I put up
> 
>    http://www-zeuthen.desy.de/~wiesand/SL5/openafs.SLx-1.4.6-58.src.rpm
> 
> which is very little different from the 1.4.5-56 build in RC1: Of the four
> patches in 1.4.6 that really matter, three were already in that build.
> Other than that, I just removed one or two very minor client fixes I had
> in -56, making 1.4.6-58 a completely unpatched build of an OpenAFS
> release.
> 
> I know this is a bit late, and I'm sorry that I couldn't come up with this
> earlier. But a few sites do use our server packages (even though few are
> on SL5 yet, but this should also go into 4.6 eventually).
> 
> I could briefly test 1.4.6-58 on a few clients, and a fileserver just
> receiving its burn-in. No problems found.
> 
> Cheers,
>         Stephan
> 

Hi Stephan,
Thanks for getting this ready.  I'll get it into the RC 2 for SL 5.1.  That 
should get it tested on a nice wide variety of machines.
Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2