SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Moelands <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Patrick Moelands <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:21:45 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
2007/11/27, Stephen J. Gowdy <[log in to unmask]>:
> Why is it harmful? It only updates already installed RPMs? Isn't -U and -i
> potentially more harmful?

The only thing you may NEVER upgrade using -U or -F is the kernel.
Suppose that the new kernel isn't working properly, you can't roll
back because upgrading removes all the previous file(s). You want to
use -i (install) so that the new kernel is installed alongside the
current one (kernel is the one exception with respect to install
alongside an existing one).

Regards,
Patrick

ATOM RSS1 RSS2