SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:59:32 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
On Nov 18, 2007 1:56 PM, Harold Norris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Its very true that you lose out on RedHat's support for a recompiled
> kernel, but if you maintain the latest version of the kernel, you should
> get the latest fixes, whatever they may be.
>
> I personally have been using Redhat with my own kernel for about 10
> years or so (RedHat 5.2) and have never had a kernel related issue.  As
> far as performance goes, if you remove all of the unnecessary modules
> from the kernel, and build it to work with the hardware you have,  it
> will run faster because the available kernels are built to run on
> generic processors.  If you take a i386 kernel and run it on a Pentium
> 4, you lose out on all optimizations for the faster processor.

Well, you do not have to use the vanilla kernel to tweak it.  Rebuild
the redhat/SL kernel by configuring the kernel to your taste.  There
is a good step-by-step guide on the CentOS wiki:

http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel

Yes, you still have to update/maintain the kernel yourself once you
customize it.  So, it's your call.

Akemi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2