SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

November 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:43:47 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
Jon Peatfield wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Troy Dawson wrote:
> 
> <snip>
>> *Troy sighs tiredly*
>> Every once in a while I just want to *talk* to some of the RedHat 
>> fellows and say "What are you thinking?"
>> RedHat is currently trying to figure out how to give users the ability 
>> to sit on a release.  They seem to be trying to do it by putting a 
>> 'minor' number in their distrubution tag.  But it's a new concept, and 
>> they don't seem to be getting it.
>> We're leaving our dist tag as 'el5' like they used to have, until they 
>> figure out what they are really going to do.  As a result, some of our 
>> rebuilt rpm's are going to say el5 while TUV will say el5_0 or el5_1.
>> As you can see from this example, el5_1 doesn't really mean it's only 
>> for RHEL 5 Update 1 only.  Because if I were wanting to stick with 
>> RHEL 5 Update 0, I would still want this critical update.
>> We'll get our rpm fixed, and hopefully TUV will also.
> 
> They seem to have changed their minds between pcre-6.6-2.el5_0.1 and 
> pcre-6.6-2.el5_1.1 'cos the specfile changelog diff contains:
> 
>  %changelog
> +* Fri Nov 09 2007 Josh Bressers <[log in to unmask]> - 6.6-2.el5_1.1
> +- Resolves: #373441, CVE-2006-7224
> +
>  * Thu Oct 11 2007 Than Ngo <[log in to unmask]> - 6.6-2.1
>  - Resolves: #315951, CVE-2007-1659, CVE-2007-1660
> 
> so pcre-6.6-2.el5_0.1 got tagged in the changelog as 6.6-2.1 and 
> pcre-6.6-2.el5_1.1 as 6.6-2.el5_1.1
> 
> It is a pity that values of rpm macros like %{dist} arn't included in 
> the set of RPMTAG_ values.
> 
>  -- Jon

Well ... it looks like someone did tell RedHat to take another look at this 
rpm.  And it looks like they did take a look at the rpm.  And, they made a change.
It is no longer critical, just important.
*Troy sighs*
Nothing like getting my hopes up just to dash them again.
I'll have my modified (release name only modification) version out in a bit.
Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2