On 19/09/07 10:02, Jan Iven wrote:
> On 18/09/07 20:54, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>> Just because we didn't reply to this, didn't mean we didn't read it 
>> and are looking at it.
>> We've also found that the pam packages are this way too.  We're in the 
>> process of rebuilding them.
>> The two questions are,
>> Where do we put them when we've recompiled them?  In the errata?  They 
>> will definatly make it into SL 5.1.
> 
> (or SL4.6, I guess/hope :-)
> 
> I don't think they will get applied if they are in the errata (unless 
> you change the release number, of course), since the "base" repository 
> will usually come first. Which means we have the optiosn to
> - replace in base (nasty, CD/DVD is different, but helps people who'd 
> like to newly install these RPMS, and nobody else would notice
> - bump release and put into errata
> - defer to next release, keep in errata until then and tell people to 
> manually overwrite in their repo if they see trouble.

by the way, did you decide on anything regarding the "conflicting" 
i386/x86_64 packages? (I may have missed some mails recently, apologies 
for nagging).
TIA
Jan