SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Christoph P. Kukulies" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:22:39 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:30:37AM -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> >We are considering buying a server for a memory intensive application.
> >It should have at least 32 GB RAM and a Intel or AMD CPU.
> >
> >The application is single threaded, single CPU, that is, in no way
> >optimized for multiple CPUS or multithreading, which does not mean it
> >could be optimized for such in the future, but not at the moment.
> >
> >Memory throughput should be optimal. The data to be processed should
> >reside all in RAM, paging should be avoided by all means.
> >
> >Would the following choice of hardware be supported by a 64-bit
> >Scientific Linux?:

I found this article regarding memory throughput and a discussion of
AMD-Opteron NUMA architecture. The conclusion is that only in 
specially customized applications one can take advatange of the
higher memory throughput.
Otherwise the memory bandwidth is limited to the FSB BW, 6.4 GB/s.

The article can be found here:
http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/cpu/rmma-numa.html


> >
> >  o Tyan Tempest i5000PT (S5283) mainboard
> >  o Intel XEON 5080 3730 MHz Diual Core CPU
> >  o 32 GB RAM
> >  o 3Ware 9590SE-8MI PCIe 4x
> >
> >Any comments welcome.

Just a last question, before I'm gonna place the order for the hardware:
with the above Intel XEON 5080 CPU I would be able to address e.g. 32GB
linearly and there is no hitch?


--
Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kukulies (at) rwth-aachen.de

ATOM RSS1 RSS2