Vrijaldenhoven, Serge wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> during generation of OS group templates for quattor, we found package tidy to give some error.
> 
> Features collected in /tmp/rpmProvides.out.28995
> Building RPM list with their requirements. May take a while (15-30 minutes)...
> WARNING : No valid arch found for tidy (x86_64) dependency libc.so.6
>           Available archs for libc.so.6 : i686
> WARNING : No valid arch found for tidy (x86_64) dependency libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
>           Available archs for libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) : i686
> WARNING : No valid arch found for tidy (x86_64) dependency libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
>           Available archs for libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) : i686
> RPM requirements collected in /tmp/rpmRequires.out.28995
> 
> 
> What seems to be the problem is that the tidy package is a 32 bit application, while having x86_64 in it's name: tidy-2005.9.1-1.x86_64.rpm
> Although it looks 64bit:
> rpm -q --queryformat "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n" -p ./tidy-2005.9.1-1.x86_64.rpm
>   warning: ./tidy-2005.9.1-1.x86_64.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 82fd17b2
>   tidy-2005.9.1-1.x86_64
> We think it's 32 bit.
> 
> 
> 1. It requires 32bit libraries
> $rpm -q --requires -p ./tidy-2005.9.1-1.x86_64.rpm
>   warning: ./tidy-2005.9.1-1.x86_64.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 82fd17b2
>   libc.so.6
>   libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
>   libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
>   rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
>   rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> 
> (64bit applications list '(64bit)' behind the dependencies)
> $rpm -q --requires -p zip-2.3-27.x86_64.rpm
>   warning: zip-2.3-27.x86_64.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID a7048f8d
>   libc.so.6()(64bit)
>   libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
>   libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit)
>   rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
>   rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> 
> 
> 2. After installing, it looks like a 32bit application
> $rpm -ivh tidy-2005.9.1-1.x86_64.rpm
>   warning: tidy-2005.9.1-1.x86_64.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 82fd17b2
>   Preparing...                ########################################### [100%]
>      1:tidy                   ########################################### [100%]
> $file /usr/bin/tidy
>   /usr/bin/tidy: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.30, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped
> $ldd /usr/bin/tidy
>         linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xffffe000)
>         libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x00325000)
>         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0030b000)
> 
> 
> Greetings,
>         Serge
> ------ -----  ----   ---    --     -
> Serge Vrijaldenhoven | ADICT (Grid Computing), Research ICT
> Philips Research | High Tech Campus  5 (Room 1.079) | 5656 AE Eindhoven | The Netherlands
> Phone:  +31(0)40 27 42052 | Fax : +31(0)40 27 42500
> ------ -----  ----   ---    --     -

Hi,

I had a quick look into the src-rpm. It's just packaging a pre-compiled 32-bit 
binary of tidy, so is bound to be 32-bit (ugly). The corresponding centos4 
packages (tidy+libtidy) install and behave perfectly ok. Rebuilding the 
centos5-variant (a bit more recent version) works as well ...

Ciao, Frank.