SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:15:03 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (43 lines)
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Benjamin Ooghe-Tabanou wrote:

> Hi everybody.
>
> I'm currently working on porting a software to 64bit machines using=
> =20
> Linux, so I'm planning to install Scientific Linux 5 on a new machine=
> =20
> for that, but before I purchase this new machine, I want to be sure I=
> =20
> can install SL5 successfully on it, and I'm not sure which 64-bit AMD=
> =20
> CPU are correctly handled by the x86_64 version of SL.
>
> Dell proposes these CPU:
> for desktops: AMD Athlon=99 64 X2 Dual-Core 3800+ and faster
> and for laptops: AMD Turion^TM 64x2 Dual-Core Mobile technology TL-50=
> =20
> and bigger
> or AMD Turion^TM 64 Mobile technology MK-36 Processor

It is not the CPU that may be a issue but the motherboard chipsets.
Some Nvidia chipsets may have issues.

What chipset is used in your current choices?

-Connie Sieh
>
> Did any of you successfully install SL on any of those processors?=
> =20
> Otherwise would you know any detail which would comfort me in choosin=
> g=20
> one of these?
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
>
> Benjamin Ooghe
> Department of Physics & Astronomy
> The Johns Hopkins University
> 3400 North Charles Street
> Baltimore, MD 21218-2686 USA
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2