Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:24:41 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Friday 13 July 2007, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, jeffrey d anderson wrote:
> > On Friday 13 July 2007 14:50, Connie Sieh wrote:
> >> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Michael Hannon wrote:
> >>> Hi, folks. I notice that the RPM's for gsl and gsl-devel no longer
> >>> seem to be included in SL 5.0.
> >>>
> >>> I.e., on a system running SL 4.4 the "Vendor" for the gsl packages is
> >>> "Scientific Linux", but on a 5.0 system the "Vendor" is "ATrpms.net".
> >>> See the appended.
> >>>
> >>> I'm perfectly happy to use Axel's repository, but I wonder: why the
> >>> change? It introduces a slight non-uniformity into one of our
> >>> procedures.
> >>
> >> TUV decided to not include gsl.
> >>
> >> Is the issue of "non-uniformity" because some of your programs come
> >> from ATrpms.net and some from SL ?
> >>
> >> Since gsl is clearly related to "science" we will research the inclusion
> >> of it in the next SL5.
> >>
> >> -connie
> >
> > Hi:
> >
> > If we're on the subject of packages deleted by TUV, but expected by
> > scientists, I'd nominate xemacs and mozilla as well.
>
> Many have looked for a xemacs src rpm that is currently supported and I
> think there was not much there. If someone wants to take xemacs and
> "support the building" of it. Then we will add it to the release. The
> "support" would include creating new versions when security issues
> dictate.
There is an xemacs for CentOS 5 in the testing area of the www.karan.org repo.
That's the one I installed. It seems to work, but of course must still be in
testing for some reason. Perhaps this 3rd party repo situation will fill
most of these holes. There are also a lot of things in CentOS extras that
work fine on SL.
>
> Mozilla is not supported by the Mozilla.org anymore. There is
> seamonkey which is mozilla but with community support.
Yes, I meant seamonkey. In that case I rebuilt from a FC6 source RPM.
>
> Firefox/thunderbird should be able to handle the mozilla/seamonkey duties.
Well, you know scientists. Sometimes they don't want to switch from "what
works" Getting them to move from mozilla-mail to thunderbird is non-trivial.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
jeffrey anderson | [log in to unmask]
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | Mailstop 50a-5101
Phone: 510 486-4208 | Fax: 510 486-6808
|
|
|