SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Hannon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Hannon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:13:14 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Hi, folks.  I notice that the RPM's for gsl and gsl-devel no longer seem 
  to be included in SL 5.0.

I.e., on a system running SL 4.4 the "Vendor" for the gsl packages is 
"Scientific Linux", but on a 5.0 system the "Vendor" is "ATrpms.net". 
See the appended.

I'm perfectly happy to use Axel's repository, but I wonder: why the 
change?  It introduces a slight non-uniformity into one of our procedures.

Thanks.

					- Mike

[[log in to unmask] ~]# rpm -qi gsl
Name        : gsl                      Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version     : 1.5                      Vendor: Scientific Linux

[[log in to unmask] ~]# rpm -qi gsl-devel
Name        : gsl-devel                Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version     : 1.5                      Vendor: Scientific Linux


[[log in to unmask] ~]# rpm -qi gsl
Name        : gsl                      Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version     : 1.8                      Vendor: ATrpms.net

[[log in to unmask] ~]# rpm -qi gsl-devel
Name        : gsl-devel                Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version     : 1.8                      Vendor: ATrpms.net

-- 
Michael Hannon            mailto:[log in to unmask]
Dept. of Physics          530.752.4966
University of California  530.752.4717 FAX
Davis, CA 95616-8677

ATOM RSS1 RSS2