SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

June 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Question about R
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:41:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
Hello,
I was wondering about R.  Do you think we should just keep it always at the 
latest release (currently 2.5.0) or should be keep it at the whatever version 
was released for that version of Scientific Linux.
So, for SL4x, it's currently at 2.3.1.  Should we keep it there, or bump it up 
to 2.5.0?
I'm not an R user, so I have no idea if the changes are dramatic or not.
As far as maintaining, for me it's easier to just keep the same version for all 
of our releases.  But that doesn't really go with the spirit of keeping things 
stable.
Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2