SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Xen versus VMware Infrastructure
From:
Axel Thimm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Sun, 6 May 2007 16:20:00 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (566 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (194 bytes) 
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 09:04:45AM -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
> BUT ... there is a hardware limitation that I've been seeing.  Basically 
> if I try to run too many virtual machines on a machine without enough 
> memory, at some point I get a "Hay ... you don't have enough memory to 
> squeeze in another virtual machine" message.  It doesn't really say 
> that, but that is what it means.

Wrt to scaling in number of vms it looks like solutions like openvz
are better. Would you be interested in ATrpms hammering together an
openvz kmdl?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

ATOM RSS1 RSS2