SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 May 2007 10:18:16 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
Johan Mares wrote:
> Yesterday I installed SL5 at home, was smoother install then FC6.
> But I have 2 questions:
> - installing madwifi was just a click, my wireless card (atheros 
> chipset) was found. But nowhere I can find where I can configure the 
> settings for wireless connection. I have done it dozens of times on 
> different versions and flavors of Ubuntu via user interface or file. 
> What is the equivalent of Ubuntu's /etc/network/interfaces file in SL ?
> I can see the wireless card called wifi0 in the network config user 
> interface. When I google most solutions start with download madwifi, 
> make, make install, ...

I don't have any of the madwifi chipset's, so I'm not positive about the 
settings.
But the main network settings on RedHat based distro's are at 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth*
/etc/sysconfig/network

For wireless, on SL5, I am finding that the NetworkManager works quite 
well.  It's much better than SL4.  It usually installed but not turned on.
   /etc/init.d/NetworkManager start
and then you use the applet (either in gnome or kde)
   nm-applet

Two words of warning.
I haven't had very good luck with NetworkManager when I am plugging in 
and out a wired network cable.  It get's confused depending on the wired 
network card.
It also doesn't follow your configurations that you have in the files. 
It seems to take those into consideration, but follows it's own rules.

> - Xen : if I want to start experimenting with Xen, where do I start: 
> Xensource documentation, Red Hat documentation or is there SL 
> documentation ?
> 

I think it would be best to use RedHat's documentation over XenSource's. 
  Not that XenSources isn't good, but that RedHat's is geared towards 
their tools and scripts, while XenScource's is geared towards their 
tools and such.

We currently can't link to RedHat's documentation, but we are working on 
the legalities of putting it on our website.  We  believe we can because 
of the way they have licensed it.  Anyway, for now here is where the 
redhat documentation is at.

http://www.redhat.com/docs/
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/Virtualization-en-US/index.html
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/Virtual_Server_Administration/index.html

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2