SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

May 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 May 2007 21:53:15 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (29 lines)
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Troy Dawson wrote:

> Hmmm ... in SL4 xorg-x11-devel provided XFree86-devel so it just installed 
> fine.
> But now in SL5, there isn't an xorg-x11-devel
>
> # yum list "xorg*devel*"
> xorg-x11-proto-devel.x86_64              7.1-9.fc6
> xorg-x11-xtrans-devel.x86_64             1.0.1-1.1.fc6
> xorg-x11-drv-i810-devel.x86_64           1.6.5-9.2.el5
> xorg-x11-drv-i810-devel.i386             1.6.5-9.2.el5
> xorg-x11-drv-via-devel.x86_64            0.2.1-9
> xorg-x11-drv-via-devel.i386              0.2.1-9
>
> I guess I could just take out the dependancy completly and let rpm itself 
> figure out what it needs.

If R is about to be rebuilt would it be worth considering updating to 
2.5.0 at the same time?

I'm mentioning it 'cos I've already had one user request for 2.5.0 though 
we are mostly still using R-2.3.1 (on SL3) so it might have just been 
because that is 'so old' that some packages can't/won't cope with it...

R releases seem to be pretty frequent -- 2.3.0 was released only a year 
before 2.5.0 so that will probably be 'old' soon too :-(

  -- Jon

ATOM RSS1 RSS2