SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 May 2007 11:33:34 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Jack Fowler <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
Subject:
From:
Jack Fowler <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
BASE64
Comments:
To: Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
 

...snip



> Hi Jack,

> It looks like atrpm's only has the newer yum headers (yum 2.2 

> and above) while we only have yum 2.0 in Scientific Linux 

> 3.0.x I'm not positive if this is just an oversite, or if it 

> is going to be that way from now on.

> 

> I've checked, and the rpm's are there, at 

> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/extra/atrpms/sl3-i386/stable/

> 

> Troy

> --



Thanks Troy. Then can/should I install yum 2.2 on SLF3.0.8? If so, where do I get it?

Thanks,

Jack


ATOM RSS1 RSS2