SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

April 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Marc W. Mengel" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Marc W. Mengel
Date:
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:54:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
I think the issue that folks are concerned about is that they have a 
package which is a combination of:
    platform-independant python/perl code
    binary loadable python/perl module (.so file)
which they cannot run on the 64-bit perl/python because they only have
a 32-bit .so file.

They seem to be ignoring the possiblity of shipping .so files for
all of the platforms they want to be able run on -- that is you could
have the ix86, the x86_64, and maybe sparc_solaris versions of the .so
with your package so that you could run it all three places...

Marc

Jaroslaw Polok wrote:
> Hi Michel
> 
> I still fail to understand what problem are you trying
> to solve here ....:
> 
> Either the application in question can be ported to
> 64 bit (so no problem ..) or not: then why to run it
> on an 64 bit system in first place ?
> 
> SL exists in both 32 and 64 bit variants ...
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Jarek
> 
> __
> -------------------------------------------------------
> _ Jaroslaw_Polok ___________________ CERN - IT/FIO/LA _
> _ http://home.cern.ch/~jpolok ___ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _
> _____________________________________ +41_78_792_0795 _

ATOM RSS1 RSS2