Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:54:45 -0600 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> Connie Sieh wrote:
>> OpenMP is a standard with precompiler directives for multithreading.
>>> From what I recall
>>> from my previous W*ndows programming days it was for Fortran and C++. I
>>> haven't checked if
>>> it is provided for other languages since then, but anyway. :-) In any
>>> case, it is about
>>> the programmer providing specific multithreading guarantees about the
>>> execution of
>>> specific code.
>>>
>>>
>>> BTW, I read in a Fedora web page that they compile its binaries with
>>> specific flags. Are
>>> the flags used for compiling SL the same as the flags used for EL?
>>
>> Fedora is NOT Enterprise. We do not know what flags are used to build
>> Enterprise as the Upstream Vendor uses a inhouse build system.
>>
>> Note that in the future (Fedora 7) that the build system to build Fedora 7
>> will be the same build system used for the Fedora Extras as Fedora Core and
>> Fedora Extras are merging and they are working on a more open build system.
>> Since the Fedora Extras build system is opensource then maybe in the future
>> one may expect that this info maybe more available.
>
>
>
> How about using the flags used for Fedora Core at least? I can't find where I
> read about them though.
I did not think that the flags for Fedora Core have been made public.
Do you have a reference to these flags.
-connie
>
>
> However OpenMP was not available to GCC sometime ago (that is when VS 8 .NET
> was under development and I checked MINGW32/GCC at that time), no compile
> problem of course since unknown #pragmas are ignored. So if GCC doesn't
> provide OpenMP yet, it may compile, I think the SMP of SL 5 may suffer, and
> perhaps bugs/incompatibilities may be introduced (for example gcc-specific or
> other multithreading code may make wrong assumptions about OpenMP based code,
> or interoperate with one another etc).
>
|
|
|