SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:33:23 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Ioannis Vranos said...
|
|Stephan Wiesand wrote:
|> 
|> Performance may be better (and should never be worse) with 4x512MB 
|> instead of 2x1GB.
|
|
|Stephan I am interested in all kinds of optimisations in general. I am not much in PC 
|hardware, however isn't the "memory bus/bandwidth/whatever_it_is_called" common/shared 
|with all memory chips (DIMMS or whatever they are called)?

Some servers do interleaved memory access such that you get better
performance this way.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2