Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:10:24 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 2/28/07, Jaroslaw Polok <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Just browsing Wikipedia to give some ideas about
> all Red Hat Enterprise Linux Clones (to put ourselves
> in a context..)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RedHat_Enterprise_Linux_clones
>
> lists the following, comments in [] are mine:
>
> * CentOS
> * Scientific Linux
> * StartCom Linux [ looks a specialized multimedia
> distro to me ]
> * White Box Enterprise Linux [ looks dead,
> the single developer joined CentOS it seems ]
Actually the main developer does his own thing still. He is not really
interested in having it a 'public' distribution but more a distro for
his workplace (If I understand the former WBEL people correctly)
> * XOS [ ?? ]
> * GENtOS [ first time I see this one .. strict RH
> compatibility does not seem to be a main goal ]
> * YOUrOS [first time I see this one too, same comment
> as above ]
> * GnYOUlinux [ does this really exist ? web site really
> a copy-cat of above ]
> * Oracle Unbreakable Linux [ no comments, lame Oracle
> attempt at Red Hat buy-out or sthg .. ]
>
There are a couple of others that are rebuilds of Centos that ISPs
remove a lot of stuff and add in webmin or other tools for their
'clients' to use.
> The following clones have ceased production:
>
> * TaoLinux [ effectively merged into CentOS ]
>
> ... so if we would join efforts with CentOS .. it could
> be really profitable to the whole community .. I believe ...
>
>
> Jarek
>
> __
> -------------------------------------------------------
> _ Jaroslaw_Polok ___________________ CERN - IT/FIO/LA _
> _ http://home.cern.ch/~jpolok ___ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _
> _____________________________________ +41_78_792_0795 _
>
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
|
|
|