On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:03:52AM -0800, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
>
> So, the question: If you had to pick a current distro that is closest
> to what SL5 will eventually be, would you start with SL4.2 or with
> Fedora Core 6?
Since I wrote that, I have been having a fun time porting stuff to
Scientific Linux 4.4 . There are some programs that worked with
2.4.22, and work with >= 2.6.17, but do not work with 2.6.9 . Fooey!
However:
I also discovered that RHEL5 beta 2 is available (!) at:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/beta/RHEL5-Beta2/
I made some CDs, and did an install on a spare drive, and RHEL5b2
more or less works. The gnome logout process does not have a checkbox
for "Save Current Setup", but I've found no other annoyances so far.
So, new plan. I will duplicate the SL4.4 drive onto the spare drive,
then try an RHEL5 upgrade on that drive and see what breaks. If that
works, I may continue my upgrade/rebuild work on that drive.
Many of the RPM packages currently installed by RHEL5 beta 2 still
carry a "fc6" identification, instead of an "el5" identification,
showing the close kinship with Fedora Core 6. They appear to be
identical otherwise. Besides some RPM naming differences, el5
and fc6 are about 80% similar, with some minor rev differences
on the remainder. Very few big changes.
There is 99%+ similarity between RHEL beta 2 and the RPMs for the
"very alpha" SL5 . Most of the differences are the SL5 extras,
and some are some configuration stuff (like artwork) and docs.
There will probably be more divergence when SL5 is finished.
Questions: What are the implications when I do the final SL5 upgrade
when that becomes available? Will RPM consider the package name
differences important, and perhaps fail on the dependencies?
Anything else to watch out for?
Keith
--
Keith Lofstrom [log in to unmask] Voice (503)-520-1993
KLIC --- Keith Lofstrom Integrated Circuits --- "Your Ideas in Silicon"
Design Contracting in Bipolar and CMOS - Analog, Digital, and Scan ICs
|