SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: xbiff or equivalent for SL4?
From:
Axel Thimm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:42:28 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (668 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (194 bytes) 
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:54:39PM -0500, Art Wildman wrote:
> >I was using xbuffy for several years and recently switched to
> >gnubiff. The latter seems quite mature, but there is no package for
> >SL4 (yet). I guess you could simply pull in the src.rpm and rebuild
> >it.
> 
> That would be sweet Axel. Dag has a spec, if you need it or we could 
> just point yum there if you don't want to duplicate it?

No, I wasn't suggesting to pick it up for ATrpms: Since Dag has it, it
is already available for SL4 (Dag only builds for RHEL). SL comes with
deactivated repo config for Dag, so if you enable it you'll be able to
install gnubiff right away.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

ATOM RSS1 RSS2