SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Oleg Sadov <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Oleg Sadov <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:58:38 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
You may get Plone RPMS for SL4x from:

ftp://ftp.linux-ink.ru/pub/SL/4.x/projects/Plone/

--Oleg

Michael Hannon wrote:
> I understand that Plone (see, e.g., https://www.scientificlinux.org/) 
> has built-in content management, although I've never used it personally.
> 
> See also:
> 
>      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_content_management_systems
> 
> 					- Mike
> 
> Ken Teh wrote:
> > I asked a question earlier about wikis and your recommendations for 
> > wikis. After more reading and discussion, it seems to me that a wiki may 
> > not be quite what we are after.
> > 
> > Essentially, what we need is some sort of groupware for a collaboration 
> > that
> > is just beginning to get off the ground.  I gather from the collaboration
> > that what they want is a web front-end to a central repository when they 
> > can
> > archive stuff like meeting notes, detector design drawings, etc., over the
> > lifetime of the project.   After hearing your recommendations, I tried out
> > mediawiki.  It's my impression that wikis are more suitable for on-going
> > discussions of topics.
> > 
> > It's been suggested to me that a CMS may be more appropriate.  So, once
> > again, I asked for your recommendations and advice.  A brief comparison of
> > the two --- wiki versus cms --- and your recommendation for a cms system.
> > 
> > Thanks! Ken
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2