Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:11:48 -0600 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I personally do not like docdb.
-Connie Sieh
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, David Saranen wrote:
> DocDB?
>
> http://docdb.fnal.gov/doc/
>
> -Dave
>
> Ken Teh wrote:
> > I asked a question earlier about wikis and your recommendations for
> > wikis. After more reading and discussion, it seems to me that a wiki may
> > not be quite what we are after.
> >
> > Essentially, what we need is some sort of groupware for a collaboration
> > that
> > is just beginning to get off the ground. I gather from the collaboration
> > that what they want is a web front-end to a central repository when they
> > can
> > archive stuff like meeting notes, detector design drawings, etc., over the
> > lifetime of the project. After hearing your recommendations, I tried out
> > mediawiki. It's my impression that wikis are more suitable for on-going
> > discussions of topics.
> >
> > It's been suggested to me that a CMS may be more appropriate. So, once
> > again, I asked for your recommendations and advice. A brief comparison of
> > the two --- wiki versus cms --- and your recommendation for a cms system.
> >
> > Thanks! Ken
>
|
|
|