SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Hannon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Hannon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:41:23 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I understand that Plone (see, e.g., https://www.scientificlinux.org/) 
has built-in content management, although I've never used it personally.

See also:

     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_content_management_systems

					- Mike

Ken Teh wrote:
> I asked a question earlier about wikis and your recommendations for 
> wikis. After more reading and discussion, it seems to me that a wiki may 
> not be quite what we are after.
> 
> Essentially, what we need is some sort of groupware for a collaboration 
> that
> is just beginning to get off the ground.  I gather from the collaboration
> that what they want is a web front-end to a central repository when they 
> can
> archive stuff like meeting notes, detector design drawings, etc., over the
> lifetime of the project.   After hearing your recommendations, I tried out
> mediawiki.  It's my impression that wikis are more suitable for on-going
> discussions of topics.
> 
> It's been suggested to me that a CMS may be more appropriate.  So, once
> again, I asked for your recommendations and advice.  A brief comparison of
> the two --- wiki versus cms --- and your recommendation for a cms system.
> 
> Thanks! Ken


-- 
Michael Hannon            mailto:[log in to unmask]
Dept. of Physics          530.752.4966
University of California  530.752.4717 FAX
Davis, CA 95616-8677

ATOM RSS1 RSS2