SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:41:29 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
On 11/30/06, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Mitja Mihelic wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is there any information about a more aproximate date for the SL5 release ?
> > Is it more like the end of 2007 Q1 or somewhere in the midle of 2007 Q1 ?
> > Befeore you ask, I know the main condition is the release of RHEL5.
>
> Yep.  RedHat had originally said Dec 2006 but has hinted at 1st quarter
> 2007.
>
> We are now working on a ALPHA of RHEL5 beta 2.
>
> > What still puzzles me is which Fedora Core is it based on, 5 or 6 ?
>
> I believe it is based on Fedora Core 6.
>

The majority of the system will be based off of Fedora Core 6. Beta1
was based on a prerelease candidate, and the Beta2 on a second RC. I
am guessing that Update 0 of 5 will be FCL6+fixes found+additional
changes.

> -Connie Sieh
> >
> > Thanks!
> > mm
> >
> >
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2