SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:26:26 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Brent L. Bates" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject:
From:
"Brent L. Bates" <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
[log in to unmask] (Miles O'Neal) "Re: XFS on SL4" (Nov 16, 11:00pm)
Organization:
ViGYAN, Inc.
Comments:
To: Scientific Linux Users mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
     We have been using XFS with SF 3.0.5 and the 2.4.21-37.EL.XFSsmp kernel
for about a year now with out any problems.  We have 4 software striped drives
(2 on each of 2 controllers, SATA) with XFS on top of that and NFS exported to
a number of other systems.  These drives contain our entire system, with the
exception of the /boot partition.  We are running the `32bit' OS.
     This discussion has got me wondering though and a bit confused.  What
platforms can run `X86_64' and which only the `32bit' one?  I guess one could
run the 32 bit OS on 64 bit hardware.  What are the advantages of the 64 bit
over the 32 bit, if any, and visa versa?  Thanks for any clarification.

-- 

  Brent L. Bates (UNIX Sys. Admin.)
  M.S. 912				Phone:(757) 865-1400, x204
  NASA Langley Research Center	  	  FAX:(757) 865-8177
  Hampton, Virginia  23681-0001
  Email: [log in to unmask]	http://www.vigyan.com/~blbates/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2