SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

August 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Achim Gsell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Achim Gsell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:10:47 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Hi Troy, All

On Friday 11 August 2006 06:25, Troy Dawson wrote:

> Back in May we talked some about moving to openafs 1.4.1, and we have
> some rpm's for it at
>
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/40rolling/testing/i386
>/RPMS/openafs
>
> What did everyone think.  Should we move to it, or stay with 1.4.0
> like we currently have.
> As for myself, I'd like to move to it because we occasionally have
> users have problems that I'm quite sure are fixed in 1.4.1

We have moved all of our SL4 clients to version 1.4.1 and all AFS 
servers are running this version. Since we moved the servers from 1.4.0 
to 1.4.1 some of the problems with our Windows clients disappeared. But 
we are not using the RPM from above URL. We have our own customized 
version with some PSI specific changes.

Cheers

Achim    

ATOM RSS1 RSS2