++ 11/08/06 08:25 -0500 - <Troy Dawson>:

Hey Troy,

> Howdy,
> Back in May we talked some about moving to openafs 1.4.1, and we have 
> some rpm's for it at
> 
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/40rolling/testing/i386/RPMS/openafs
> 
> What did everyone think.  Should we move to it, or stay with 1.4.0 like 
> we currently have.
> As for myself, I'd like to move to it because we occasionally have users 
> have problems that I'm quite sure are fixed in 1.4.1
 
We've moved most of our clients and servers to 1.4.1.  We have a mix of
Linux, including SL, and Solaris. 1.4.1 has been stable. 

I can't say anything about the relative merits of 1.4.0 vs. 1.4.1, but we
moved from release candidate to release candidate within 1.4.0 to solve
problems. Now we're happier that we don't have a version mix and large file
handling works much better.

Thanks,
John

> Troy
> 
> -- 
> __________________________________________________
> Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
> Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
> __________________________________________________

##############################################
# John Goebel <jgoebel(at)slac.stanford.edu> #
# Stanford Linear Accelerator Center         #
# 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025  #
############################################ #