SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

August 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:02:11 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (43 lines)
It is there now.

Thanks for reporting this.

-connie
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Stephan Wiesand wrote:

> Hi developers,
> 
> I received a bunch of "missing dependency" mails from part of my 
> 307/x86_64 systems today when they should have appled the latest update 
> to XFree86 & friends.
> 
> The complaint from yum was that "Package XFree86-libs needs libGL.so.1, 
> this is not available."
> 
> Indeed:
> 
> # rpm -q --whatprovides libGL.so.1
> no package provides libGL.so.1
> # rpm -q --whatrequires libGL.so.1
> XFree86-libs-4.3.0-98.EL.i386
> 
> Hmm, I swear I haven't installed it with --nodeps... wonder how it could 
> ever get onto the disk. This only affected systems initially installed 
> with 3.0.7. Systems installed with 3.0.5 in the first place have no 
> problem:
> 
> # rpm -q --whatprovides libGL.so.1
> XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.3.0-97.EL.i386
> 
> Looks like XFree86-Mesa-libGL.i386 was part of the initial release of
> 305/x86_64, and two rounds of errata, but then got dropped, and it's 
> missing from the 3rd round of 305 errata (not causing dependency problems 
> because the older versions are available) and both the 307 release and the 
> 307 errata.
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Stephan
> 
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2