SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

August 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:59:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
Hi Stephan,
Looks like we missed that one.  We're sorry about that.  It's getting 
pushed out right now.
We're double checking some of the other i386 on x86_64 parts as well.
Troy

Stephan Wiesand wrote:
> Hi developers,
> 
> I received a bunch of "missing dependency" mails from part of my 
> 307/x86_64 systems today when they should have appled the latest update 
> to XFree86 & friends.
> 
> The complaint from yum was that "Package XFree86-libs needs libGL.so.1, 
> this is not available."
> 
> Indeed:
> 
> # rpm -q --whatprovides libGL.so.1
> no package provides libGL.so.1
> # rpm -q --whatrequires libGL.so.1
> XFree86-libs-4.3.0-98.EL.i386
> 
> Hmm, I swear I haven't installed it with --nodeps... wonder how it could 
> ever get onto the disk. This only affected systems initially installed 
> with 3.0.7. Systems installed with 3.0.5 in the first place have no 
> problem:
> 
> # rpm -q --whatprovides libGL.so.1
> XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.3.0-97.EL.i386
> 
> Looks like XFree86-Mesa-libGL.i386 was part of the initial release of
> 305/x86_64, and two rounds of errata, but then got dropped, and it's 
> missing from the 3rd round of 305 errata (not causing dependency problems 
> because the older versions are available) and both the 307 release and the 
> 307 errata.
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Stephan
> 
> 


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2