Round 2
Jarek's spec (i386, x86_64, src)
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/30rolling/testing/i386/RPMS/firefox/firefox-1.5.0.5-0.SL3.1.i386.rpm
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/30rolling/testing/x86_64/RPMS/firefox/firefox-1.5.0.5-0.SL3.1.x86_64.rpm
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/30rolling/testing/i386/SRPMS/firefox/firefox-1.5.0.5-0.SL3.1.src.rpm
Stephan's spec (i386, src)
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/30rolling/testing/i386/RPMS/firefox/firefox-1.5.0.5-0.SL3.2.i386.rpm
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/30rolling/testing/i386/SRPMS/firefox/firefox-1.5.0.5-0.SL3.2.src.rpm
So, it sounds like Stephan's spec file is almost doing the same thing as
Jarek's, just in a different way. But I guess it wouldn't hurt to try
both of them.
Troy
Troy Dawson wrote:
> Rount 1 - i386.
>
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/30rolling/testing/i386/RPMS/firefox/firefox-1.5.0.5-0.SL3.1.i386.rpm
>
>
> This is using Jarek's spec's, with changes in SOURCES/firefox-mozconfig
> The source rpm and x86_64 rpm will be up in about an hour and a half.
>
> I am currently rebuilding firefox using Stephan's spec file, without
> SOURCES/firefox-mozconfig changed. Rebuild's take about 2 1/2 on the
> machine (It was fast for it's time), so expect about 3 hours for the
> i386 version.
>
> I will post when that is ready. It will be
> firefox-1.5.0.5-0.SL3.2.i386.rpm
>
> Troy
>
> Jon Peatfield wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Troy Dawson wrote:
>>
>>> Stephan Wiesand wrote:
>>
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>> Just in case it may help (I'm quite sure you don't need it, but who
>>>> knows), I've put up the spec for my test build here:
>>>>
>>>> http://www-zeuthen.desy.de/~wiesand/firefox-SL.spec
>>>>
>>>> No input files were changed except the spec and Source12 (the default
>>>> bookmarks).
>>>>
>>>
>>> First answer
>>> Yes, we plan on backporting the firefox 1.5.x to S.L. 3.0.x.
>>> We do not plan on pushing it right out into the mainstream errata
>>> because this is a major change. It will go into the 30rolling, or
>>> maybe the 30rolling/testing area. We want people to be able to have
>>> access to them and test them out.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'll put the test (i386) versions on a couple of boxes for some
>> (light) testing once I know where to pull them from...
>>
>> I can't see an obvious 30rolling/testing area or I couldn't 10 mins
>> ago anyway. Did it just get created?
>>
>> Anyway I still need to re-work some of my post-install hacks to cope
>> with having seamonkey instead of mozilla...
>>
>>> I already have the i386 version done, based on Jarek's changes. The
>>> only variation is he didn't mention changing the bookmarks, which I
>>> have done.
>>>
>>> I am a little supprised that people are having problem with Pango,
>>> because for the older backports (firefox 1.0.x) we pulled the pango
>>> patches out, and nobody complained about those. But, as has been
>>> said, this is a major change.
>>
>>
>>
>> For firefox 1.0.x (1.0.8 at least) the specfile had pango-related
>> *patches* commented out, but was still linked against the SL3 pango
>> (1.2.x). [ The patches required a newer version of pango (I think!) ].
>>
>> Disabling pango might cause problems for some (e.g. Far-Eastern) text,
>> or it might be that ffox just uses it's own routines if pango is
>> unavailable or disabled.
>>
>> Firefox 1.5.x seems to need a newer version of pango than SL3 comes with.
>>
>>> I am not against making another compile of the firefox with your
>>> (Stephan) spec file, and put it up to let people see if it fixes or
>>> breaks anything. If we don't have to change the firefox-mozconfig
>>> file that would be nice, one less change we have to worry about.
>>
>>
>>
>> The specfile mentioned above says:
>>
>> * Sat Jul 29 2006 Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]> -
>> 1.5.0.5-0.SL3.1
>> - made it build and install on SL3 (no pango)
>> - replaced default bookmarks with SL ones
>>
>> so I'd assume that it *is* disabling pango too...
>>
>> I'd certainly be happy with a pango-less version initially (hey most
>> of the world just uses iso-8859-1 anyway!!) though if that annoys lots
>> of people it might be worth re-visiting later...
>>
>> -- Jon
>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/CSS CSI Group
__________________________________________________
|