SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeremy Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeremy Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:38:47 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (17 lines)
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Miles O'Neal wrote:

> But it's the number of directories that is causing us problems.  We have 
> apps that now generate 50-60K directories in a directory, and as chip 
> complexity grows, these apps will almost certainly create over 100K 
> directories in a directory.  Not files, directories.

Ah, I think the earlier post was a bit ambiguous. The 32K directory limit 
in a directory looks hard.

Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Sanders <[log in to unmask]>   http://www-xray.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jss/
X-Ray Group, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, UK.
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: E1AAE053

ATOM RSS1 RSS2